Legal Opinion

More v. Calkins

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1890No. 13565PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This appeal is from a final judgment for defendant on general demurrer to the complaint, and the questions for decision relate to the sufficiency of the complaint as against a general demurrer.

A. S. More, having commenced the action in his lifetime, died pending a demurrer to his complaint. After substitution of his administrator, Thomas R. More, as plaintiff, the demurrer was sustained, and the administrator filed an amended complaint, a general demurrer to which was also sustained; and it is the sufficiency of this amended complaint which is in question here.

After averring the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rossett v. FisherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  2. Capehart v. . BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Kornegay v. . SpicerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. Dickerson v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Curry v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Ripperdan v. WeldyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Castro v. GeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Jacks v. EsteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. More v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API