Fetterley v. Randall
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, J., pro tem.
The parties to this cause are Oliver Fetterley, plaintiff, cross-defendant and respondent; Helen M. Randall, defendant, cross-defendant and appellant, and First Savings Bank of Vallejo, California, defendant and cross-complainant. On the 13'th of March, 1922, and after a proceeding authorized by sections 2168, 2169 and 2170 of the Political Code, viz., a hearing before a superior judge with two physicians present, sometimes referred to as the lunacy commission, respondent was ordered committed to the state hospital for the insane. Before his trial thereon before a court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kellogg v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Ripperdan v. WeldyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hsu v. Mt. Zion HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Moneta v. HoinackiIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re ZanettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Carroll v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. FieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.