Legal Opinion
Moore v. City of Raleigh
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 19, 1999No. COA98-1297PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
On appeal, defendant contends that the North Carolina Industrial Commission (“Industrial Commission”) erred in considering plain tiff’s appeal of the deputy commissioner’s opinion and award because plaintiff failed to file his appeal within the fifteen day period required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-85 (1991) and did not show excusable neglect. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse the opinion and award of the full Industrial Commission.
Evidence in the present case indicates that Christopher Todd Moore (“plaintiff’) was hired by the City of Raleigh (“defendant”) in December 1990 as a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Grantham v. R. G. Barry Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Butts v. . Montague Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Neal v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Aaron v. New Fortis Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Creasman v. CreasmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Shockley v. Cairn Studios Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Cornell v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Jenkins v. Piedmont Aviation ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Sellers v. FMC Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.