Kantor v. Aristo Hosiery Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.
This action is brought by plaintiff as assignee to recover the purchase price, expressed in English currency, of hosiery sold and delivered by H. Reid & Co. of London to the defendant.
The judgment for the plaintiff is attacked on the ground that an order blank signed by the defendant was an integrating document and that no oral evidence inconsistent with its terms should have been admitted. The writing was not signed by H. Reid & Co. and the conduct of the parties shows beyond doubt that it was not acted upon as the contract. The rulings of the trial court in this respect were correct.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Filiale Nurnberg v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hicks v. GuinnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Sirie v. GodfreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Taubenfeld v. TaubenfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Richard v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.