Legal Opinion
Taubenfeld v. Taubenfeld
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNathan, J.
This is an action to recover sums claimed to be due and unpaid under a Polish matrimonial judgment.
Plaintiff and defendant were married in Belgium in 1928, and shortly thereafter took up residence in Poland, of which country defendant was then a national. In 1932 plaintiff obtained a judgment of a competent court in Warsaw, Poland, requiring defendant to pay her 250 zlotys per month for her support. There is no evidence that such judgment has since been modified or vacated.
Defendant came to the United States in 1938 and did not return thereafter to Poland. He made payments pursuant to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Deutsche Bank Filiale Nurnberg v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Parker v. HoppeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rossi v. RossiNew York Supreme Court · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Cahn v. CahnCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Newmont Mines Ltd. v. Adriatic InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- CUNNINGHAM BY CUNNINGHAM v. Quaker Oats Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1986
- Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986