Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Held: In an action properly brought in the courts of this state by a citizen or an alien to recover damages, liquidated or unliquidated, for breach of contract or for a tort, where primarily the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum expressed in foreign money, in determining the amount of the judgment expressed in our currency the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of the breach of contract or at the date of the commission of the tort is under ordinary circumstances to be applied. (Gross v. Mendel, 171 App. Div. 237; affd., 225…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gross v. . MendelNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Gross v. MendelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by54 opinions
- Simon v. Electrospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hicks v. GuinnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Competex, S.A. (In Liquidation) v. Ronald LabowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Shaw, Savill, Albion & Co., Ltd. v. The Fredericksburg. The TamaroaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.