Legal Opinion
Richard v. National City Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 13, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The essential facts in this litigation having been stated by Mr. Justice McAvoy, it will be unnecessary to repeat them at length.
Although many questions have been raised upon this appeal, in view of the several decisions on this subject, we think there is but one now before us for determination. All the other issues appear to have been disposed of by decision of the Court of Appeals. The question involved which we think is still open, especially in view of the proof in this particular case, is the rule of damages to be applied to the facts here proved. At the outset it may be well to call…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Filiale Nurnberg v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hicks v. GuinnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tillman v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Tat Ba v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Lubomirska v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931