Legal Opinion
Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 4, 1985No. 644PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
754 F.2d 452
VISHIPCO LINE, Ha Nam Cong Ty, Dai Nam Hang Hai C.T., Rang
Dong Hang Hai C.T., Mekong Ship Co. Sarl, Vishipco Sarl,
Thai Binh C.T., Vn Tau Bien C.T., Van An Hang Hai C.T., Cong
Ty U Tau Sao Mai and Nguyen Thi Cham, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 644, Docket 84-7778.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 15, 1985.
Decided Feb. 4, 1985.
Arthur M. Boal, Jr., New York City (Boal, Doti & Larsen, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Andrew J. Connick, New York City (Paul T. Shoemaker, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hughes Tool Co. v. United Artists Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Kantor v. Aristo Hosiery Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trinh v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985