Keene v. Behan
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered January Y, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, foreclosing a chattel mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
Action to foreclose a chattel mortgage. From a judgment and decree in favor of respondent, this appeal has heen taken.
On April 21, 1904, appellants, Wallace C. Behan and Mae Behan, his wife, executed and delivered to one R. 0. Reed seven promissory notes, six for the sum of $12.50 each, one falling due May 10, 1904, and one each month thereafter; and the seventh note for $84.50, falling due November 10, 1904. All of said notes bore interest from date at the rate of one per cent per month, payable monthly, and contained a stipulation that, if said interest was not so paid, the whole sum of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Violet v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Coey v. DarknellWashington Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. OrrIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Langley v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Crilly v. MorrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Ives v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.