Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Sanderson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1923No. Civil No. 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Superior Judge.

This is an action by the appellant, plaintiff below, designated the “plaintiff,” against the appellee, defendant below, designated the “defendant,” upon a promissory note dated January 31, 1918, payable to Ruby and Bowers, and executed by the defendant. On April 18, 1918, before maturity of the note, the same was indorsed by Ruby and Bowers to the plaintiff, Lee Arnett. The note was given as part of the purchase price for a certain breeding jack, which Ruby and Bowers sold to the defendant. The case was tried before a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the defendant.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Berrendo Irrigated Farms Co. v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hodgkins v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Link v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Everding & Farrell v. ToftOregon Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lutfy v. R. D. Roper & Sons Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pinnacle Peak Developers v. TRW Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Peoples BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Torosian v. PaulosArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. George Blow v. H. Max Ammerman, George Blow v. A. L. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API