Legal Opinion
Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 2002No. S-9379PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I,. INTRODUCTION
Tesoro Petroleum Company challenges the civil investigative demand (CID) served on the company by Alaska's attorney general as part of an investigation into gasoline prices. Tesoro contends that the CID was overbroad and that the State impermissibly disclosed to outside counsel documents that Tesoro produced in response to the CID. Because Spencer Hosie, outside counsel to the attorney general, should be considered "an authorized employee of the state" for purposes of AS 45.50.592(e), we affirm the superior court's decision to allow disclosure of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- McMann v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,017 Securities and Exchange Commission, and Cross-Appellant v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Simpson v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.