In re Sealed Case
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
In light of the recent indictment of former Secretary of Agriculture, Mike Espy, it is no longer necessary to maintain under seal any portion of the Court’s opinion issued on June 17, 1997. It is, therefore, ORDERED, on the Court’s own motion, that the opinion be amended as follows:
The previously sealed portions are hereby unsealed. The Clerk is directed to file and issue the unredacted opinion.
Footnote 24 of the opinion issued on June 17,1997, shall be deleted. [Editor’s Note: A different footnote 24 is included as part of this published opinion.]
Appeal from the United States District…
3Cases cited81 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by458 opinions
- Loving v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. Office of Management & BudgetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. FBICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
453 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.