Ratsey Lapthorn, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LawbeNce, Judge:
The question here presented for our determination is the proper classification of certain piston hanks, spinnaker swivels, plain swivels, grommets, and thimbles which are utilized exclusively in the manufacture of sails for pleasure yachts. The thimbles were classified by the collector of customs as articles or wares not specially provided for, composed of metal, upon which duty was assessed at the. rate of 45 per centum ad valorem in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397). The remaining articles were similarly classified by the collector, and,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Wico Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Healthway's, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952