Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 10, 1967No. C.D. 2948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, was imported from Canada on various dates in 1964 and 1965. It was described on the invoices as “Elastomuffles” or “Silent Sailors” and consists of various sized mufflers used in connection with motorboat engines. The articles were assessed with duty at 17 per centum ad valorem under item 774.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics. While several claims were made in the protests and the amended protests, the claim before the court is that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Motorola, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Wedemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Spiegel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. West Coast Glass Distributors v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API