Legal Opinion

Wico Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 27, 1968No. C.D. 3376PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The issue in this case concerns the proper classification of ebonite balls measuring 4y2 inches in diameter which are used in coin-operated bowling machines. The articles were classified by the collector of customs under Item 735.12 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “Other balls for games * * * not provided for in the foregoing provisions of this subpart” and assessed with duty at the rate of 15 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the balls are properly classifiable under Item 734.20 as parts of “Game machines, including coin * * * operated game machines,”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Davis Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  4. Rembar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Ratsey Lapthorn, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. American Astral Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Haan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Stonewall Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API