Legal Opinion

Myers v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1924No. 2385PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bland, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

Steel rods imported by appellants from Canada known as main rods, intermediate side rods, rear side rods and front side rods and *351which fasten onto the drive wheels of railway locomotives, were classified by the collector under paragraph 399 of the act of 1922 at 40 per cent ad valorem as manufactures of metal.

Paragraph 399 of the act of 1922 is as follows:

Articles or wares' not specially provided for, if .composed, wholly or in chief value of platinum, gold, or silver, and .articles or wares plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Soule v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Ratsey Lapthorn, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  4. West Coast Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API