Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1981No. L.A. 31454PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Is an indigent person who is required to work in order to receive general assistance benefits entitled to workers’ compensation for an injury sustained on the job?

I

In 1971, petitioner, the County of Los Angeles (County), provided two types of general assistance benefits, commonly known as “welfare” and “workfare,” to qualified indigent applicants. The County assigned applicants who were able to work to the workfare program. Those who were unable to work were assigned to the welfare program. Applicants of comparable need received the same level of benefits in each program.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kowalski v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Marsh v. Tilley Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cianci v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API