Legal Opinion

Cianci v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. S.F. 24893PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review to resolve two important questions: (1) whether state courts have jurisdiction concurrently with federal courts over alleged violations of the civil provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.); and (2) whether the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16700 et seq.) applies to the medical profession. We answer each question in the affirmative.

I

The action underlying this proceeding arises, in brief, out of a dispute among several medical doctors over the establishment, funding, and operation of a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API