Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1985No. S.F. 24599PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*203Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
Does a county violate Welfare and Institutions Code section 17000 et seq. or the California Constitution when it requires its residents who are single, employable and eligible for general assistance benefits to live in a county facility in lieu of cash benefits?
I
Petitioners (plaintiffs) are 20 single, employable residents of the County of Sacramento (County) who are eligible for general assistance benefits,1 the California Coalition of Welfare Rights Organizations, and the Depression Survival Action Committee. Real parties in interest (defendants) are the County, the County…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- CBS, INC. v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.