Legal Opinion

Glover v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 6, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge.

The only issue presented by this review of an award entered by the Industrial Commission is whether the petitioner was entitled to a hearing de novo upon remand from this Court. We hold that on the facts here presented, she was so entitled.

The facts underlying this workmen’s compensation claim were before this Court in Glover v. Industrial Commission, 17 Ariz.App. 454, 498 P.2d 528 (1972), so we need not delve into them with great detail. When this matter was first before this Court, in setting aside the award of the Commission the Court held that the hearing officer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Magma Copper Co. v. AldreteArizona Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Arrowhead Press, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Associated Grocers v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Arrowhead Press, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Glover v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API