Associated Grocers v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The issue raised by respondent employee’s motion to dismiss is whether a carrier who was a party to a “consolidated award” before the Industrial Commission is an indispensable party to a review of that award.
The posture of this matter before the Industrial Commission was the familiar situation of a claimant who, although presently suffering from one physical condition, is faced with the problem of determining whether that condition is the result of a prior industrial injury or is the result of a new industrial injury. The employee, Harold Van Horn, followed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Staffco, Inc. v. Maricopa Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Town of Gila Bend v. Walled Lake Door CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Hopper v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Torosian v. PaulosArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- A.J. Goulder Electric v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- AJ Goulder Elec. v. INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Sherman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988