Legal Opinion

Associated Grocers v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 15, 1980No. 1 CA-IC 2308PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The issue raised by respondent employee’s motion to dismiss is whether a carrier who was a party to a “consolidated award” before the Industrial Commission is an indispensable party to a review of that award.

The posture of this matter before the Industrial Commission was the familiar situation of a claimant who, although presently suffering from one physical condition, is faced with the problem of determining whether that condition is the result of a prior industrial injury or is the result of a new industrial injury. The employee, Harold Van Horn, followed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Staffco, Inc. v. Maricopa Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Town of Gila Bend v. Walled Lake Door CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hopper v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Torosian v. PaulosArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. A.J. Goulder Electric v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. AJ Goulder Elec. v. INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Sherman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API