Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1972No. 10535-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
This court granted Rutledge’s petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals (Rutledge v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App. 317, 483 P.2d 58 [1971]) affirming a non-compensable award of the Industrial Commission. The Court of Appeals had previously set aside an award of the Commission in the same case. See Rutledge v. Industrial Commission, 9 Ariz.App. 316, 451 P.2d 894 (1969).
We are asked to determine :
1. whether a “de novo” hearing was proper after a prior award was set aside by the Court of Appeals,
2. whether the statement by the Court of Appeals that there was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Pedro PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Bedwell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- George Mefford v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- May L. Hayes v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Prigosin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Garza v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Cash v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Pais v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.