Legal Opinion

Arrowhead Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 1982No. 1 CA-IC 2627PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

In this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission, we hold that the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction to determine the reasonableness of charges for prescription drugs as between the carrier and the claimant. Because the administrative law judge erred in deciding this issue, the award must be set aside. See A.R.S. § 23-951(D).

In July 1975, claimant was injured in an industrially related automobile accident in which she suffered an injury to her right leg as well as other injuries. Claimant was hospitalized at the time of the accident and again in October…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bedwell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. D'AMICO v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Gibbons v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Special Fund Division v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. GirardotWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API