Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1967No. Crim. 11889PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.

The only question on this appeal is whether a security guard employed by the Los Angeles County General Hospital belongs to the “authorities” who must have advised a suspect of his constitutional rights before an incriminating statement by the suspect may be admitted in evidence. (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 472 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602,10 A.L.R.3d 974]; People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361].)

Defendant had apparently burglarized an automobile which was parked at the Los Angeles County General Hospital. Security guards employed by the hospital took him to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Schaumberg v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. Dyas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. HeritageWashington Supreme Court · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API