People v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.
The only question on this appeal is whether a security guard employed by the Los Angeles County General Hospital belongs to the “authorities” who must have advised a suspect of his constitutional rights before an incriminating statement by the suspect may be admitted in evidence. (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 472 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602,10 A.L.R.3d 974]; People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361].)
Defendant had apparently burglarized an automobile which was parked at the Los Angeles County General Hospital. Security guards employed by the hospital took him to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Schaumberg v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Dyas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. HeritageWashington Supreme Court · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.