Legal Opinion

Waterstone Bank, SSB v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 24, 2013No. 2012AP912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUBAUER, PJ.

¶ 1. In this property insurance dispute, American Family Mutual Insurance Company denied loss payment because its businessowners policy does not cover loss or damage caused by water damage, vandalism or theft if the property is vacant for more than sixty days. Waterstone Bank, SSB (the Bank) argues that the policy's mortgageholder clause entitles it to recover because American Family's denial under the vacancy provision was based on an act of the property owner/named insured, namely, the act of leaving the property vacant. The circuit court entered judgment in favor of American…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foremost Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Western Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Iron Horse Auto, Inc. v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Bank of Cashton v. La Crosse County Scandinavian Town Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. NullMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Old Second National Bank v. Indiana Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Old Second National Bank v. Indiana Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. WithamDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API