Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Null

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 2014No. Docket No. 312485PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoonstra, P.J.

In this insurance dispute, plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., appeals by right the September 4, 2012 order of the trial court granting summary *510disposition in favor of defendants Elizabeth A. Null and Auto-Owners Insurance Company under MCR 2.116(C)(10).1 Specifically, the trial court ruled that Wells Fargo, the mortgagee, was not entitled to coverage under an insurance policy issued by Auto-Owners to the mortgagor, Lonnie Null, Elizabeth’s brother-in-law. The trial court also held that a previous order, entered in an earlier case brought by Elizabeth against Auto-Owners and Wells Fargo, which…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Monat v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Old Second National Bank v. Indiana Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. James Edwards v. Detroit News IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Old Second National Bank v. Indiana Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. McJIMPSON v. AUTO CLUB GROUP INSURANCE COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Auto Club Group Insurance Company v. Dante LouisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API