Legal Opinion

Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 2015No. A14-247PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

This case requires us to interpret and reconcile two clauses in a property insurance policy: a standard mortgage clause and a vacancy clause. Appellant West Bend Mutual Insurance Company (“West Bend”) issued a policy of insurance on a building. Commerce Bank was named in the policy as mortgagee. After the building was vandalized, Commerce Bank made a claim on the policy, but West Bend denied the claim under the vacancy clause. The court of appeals ruled that under the standard mortgage clause, Commerce Bank was entitled to recover. We reverse and remand.

I

In February…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  3. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Storms, Inc. v. Mathy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Fenrich v. Blake Sch.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  4. Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API