Bank of Cashton v. La Crosse County Scandinavian Town Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The dispute arises over the interpretation of part of the mortgage clause reading: “That no default of the mortgagor shall affect the mortgagee’s right to recover in case of loss hereunder except upon ten days’ written notice to the mortgagee of such default.” The appellant contends that “default” as there used refers to the non-payment of premiums and does not enlarge the coverage. It appears to be conceded that had the clause been drawn using the words “any act or neglect of the mortgagor” instead of the words “that no default of the mortgagor” shall affect the mortgagee’s right, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Andrew Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Paris Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Tomashek v. Hartland Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by16 opinions
- Capital Investments, Inc. v. Whitehall Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Farley v. SalowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Estate of BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Henry G. Meigs, Inc. v. Empire Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Polar Manufacturing Co. v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.