Legal Opinion

Iron Horse Auto, Inc. v. Lititz Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 27, 2007No. 96,772PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Lititz Mutual Insurance Company (Insurance Company) appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Capital City Bank (Bank), whereby the district court found that the Insurance Company’s commercial insurance policy provided for a loss payment to the Bank, as mortgageholder, notwithstanding the named insured’s filing of a fraudulent claim. The Insurance Company contends that K.S.A. 40-2,118(c) excused the payment to the Bank and, further, that the policy provisions and endorsements specifically excluded coverage for die Bank. Disagreeing on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Foster v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bussman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. Foster v. Stonebridge Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. Waterstone Bank, SSB v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API