Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Witham
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided September 28, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-325 (MTT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Lloyd’s”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Bert Witham (“Wit-ham”) have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 74; 77). For the reasons stated below, Lloyd’s motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. Witham’s motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises from a dispute regarding Lloyd’s obligations to Witham pursuant to an insurance policy (the “Policy”) covering certain property located at 551 Bethesda Avenue, Macon, Georgia (“Bethseda Avenue property”) that was…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amin v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- Ussery v. Allstate Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
- Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. BP Investment Partners, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021