Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Buckeye Irr. Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STANFORD, Chief Justice.
This case presents an appeal from a judgment of the lower court dismissing the complaint in intervention filed by the Gillespie Land and Irrigation Company, which complaint in intervention had theretofore been filed in an action wherein the Buckeye Irrigation Company and Arlington Canal Company were plaintiffs, and the Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association was one of 5,206 defendants. The purpose of the original litigation was to determine the rights of the plaintiffs and defendants in and to the waters of the Gila River System. The Gillespie Company, by its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901
- Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1904
- Olsen v. Union Canal & Irrigation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Tattersfield v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Brockman v. Grand Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila RiverArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Monclova v. Financial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. KovacovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Davis v. Agua Sierra Resources, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Matter of Davin P. (Davida V.)New York Family Court, Kings County · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.