Legal Opinion

Tattersfield v. Putnam

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1935No. Civil No. 3481PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court, rendered in a proceeding brought under the provisions of the State Water Code, to determine the relative rights of various claimants to the waters of Pantano Creek. The facts, as they appear from the findings of the trial court and as they may reasonably be inferred from the evidence so far as the latter establishes facts necessary to sustain the judgment, and which were not specifically found by the trial court, may be stated as follows:

In the year 1891, C. O. Crane and J. J. Fraker had either acquired or initiated the right to acquire…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  5. Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Scherck v. NicholsWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  3. United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  4. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. KovacovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Buckeye Irr. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API