Legal Opinion
In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila River
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1992No. WC-90-0001-IRPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
We granted review of this interlocutory appeal to determine whether the procedures adopted by the trial court for service of summons and filing and service of pleadings in this water rights adjudication proceeding comport with due process under the United States and Arizona Constitutions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 45-252 and Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3). See infra note 2.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case is a consolidated general adjudication of all water rights in the Salt, Verde, Gila, Agua Fria, Upper Santa Cruz, and San Pedro River…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Hedlund v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Benjamin v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.