Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Union Canal & Irrigation Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1941No. Civil No. 4372PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— This is an appeal by Elam Olsen, plaintiff, from a judgment in favor of Union Canal and Irrigation Company, a corporation, called the company, J. H. Asay and Roy A. Layton, defendants. The facts upon which the appeal must be decided are not in serious dispute, and may be stated as follows:

In 1874 various farmers in the Safford valley, in Graham County, began to irrigate their lands from the Gila River. A number of canals were constructed by the mutual efforts of the landowning farmers among them being what is known as the Union canal. During the many years of its existence it has been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Elson Development Co. v. Arizona Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. KovacovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Buckeye Irr. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Natural Gas Service Co. v. Serv-Yu Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API