Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. On rehearing. Memorandum decision, ante, p. 111. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
A rehearing was granted in this case at the last term of the court. As no opinion was filed upon the first hearing, we deem it proper to state now, with some fullness, the facts and our holding on these facts. The Maricopa Canal Company was organized under the general incorporation act of the territory during the year 1875. Its purpose, as expressed in its articles, was the carrying on and conducting of the business of supplying a portion of the Salt River Valley with water for irrigation, milling, manufacturing, and mechanical purposes. Its capital stock was divided into fifty *443shares, each…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oury v. GoodwinArizona Supreme Court · 1891
- Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by17 opinions
- Murphy v. KerrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923
- United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. Laramie Rivers Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Gerber v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.