Legal Opinion

Curtiss & Yale Co. v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1913No. Nos. 18,189—(48)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in tbe district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to certain real property. The answer alleged defendant claimed an easement and right of way for the purposes of a public highway in the southwesterly 80 feet in width of the land described,, and set out the platting of the land by Calvin A. Tuttle, the owner,, as mentioned in the opinion, and conveyances by him according to-the plat, and alleged that by so doing he dedicated to the public for a…

Read the full summary

Action in tbe district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to certain real property. The answer alleged defendant claimed an easement and right of way for the purposes of a public highway in the southwesterly 80 feet in width of the land described,, and set out the platting of the land by Calvin A. Tuttle, the owner,, as mentioned in the opinion, and conveyances by him according to-the plat, and alleged that by so doing he dedicated to the public for a public street the 80 feet in question. The reply alleged that defendant more than 30 years before the action abandoned any…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action to determine adverse claims to certain real property. The-facts are as follows:

Calvin A. Tuttle was the owner of a tract of land situated within the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 24, township 29, of range 24, in the county of Hennepin. On May 15, 1855, he caused the same or a part thereof to be platted into lots and blocks, as Tuttle’s Addition to St. Anthony. The plat was in proper form, as respects the lots, blocks and streets marked out thereon, and there-was attached thereto the following certificate:

“Territory of Minnesota, \ “County of Ramsey. ^
“Be it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stuttgart v. JohnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Todd v. WeedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Hurley v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. Williams v. Milwaukee Industrial Exposition Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Mattson v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Paynesville Land Co. v. GrabowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Tissino v. MavrakisWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Daly v. Duwane Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Couture v. NovotnySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Hemsley v. SageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API