Couture v. Novotny
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
This action was brought to recover for personal injuries resulting from a head-on collision. After the trial court instructed that defendant driver was negligent as a matter of law, the jury found no negligence on the part of plaintiff and assessed damages at $25,000. Defendants appeal from the denial of their motion for a new trial. We reverse.
Defendants raise two issues on appeal: First, whether the trial court erred in failing to give a requested instruction concerning plaintiff’s duty to mitigate damages through proper care and treatment of his injuries. Secondly, whether…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gibbs v. AlmstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Otos v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Charles Stark, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Shell Oil Company v. Highlands Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Jenkins v. American Automobile Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Maroney v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michaud v. SteckinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Adee v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Automatic Merchandisers, Inc. v. WardNevada Supreme Court · 1982