Mattson v. Warner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to determine-adverse claims to certain real estate. The case was tried .before. Dibell, J., who made the findings mentioned in the third paragraph, of the opinion, and ordered judgment in favor of defendants. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law, or for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This action was brought to determine adverse claims to- three lots= in West -Duluth. Plaintiff alleged ownership in himself. The answer denied that plaintiff was the owner of the lots, alleged that defendants were the owners, and asked affirmative relief. On the-trial plaintiff sought to prove title by adverse possession; the record title being in defendants.
The evidence showed that the lots were situated about four and' one-half miles from the business district of Dfiluth, and one mile-from the business portion of West Duluth. In 1891 these lots and. the adjoining land, though platted, were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dean v. GoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Todd v. WeedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Carpenter v. ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Brown v. KohoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Costello v. EdsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rupley v. FraserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Cain v. Highland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Curtiss & Yale Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Mitchell v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Stevens v. VeldeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.