Legal Opinion
Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1924No. 24,121PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
On May 29, 1920, an earnest money contract was made by defendant with the Paynesville Land Company by George J. Andrews, which contract in part is as follows: to-wit:
“EARNEST MONEY CONTRACT OF SALE.
Paynesville, May 29, 1920.
“RECEIVED of Wm. A. Grabow One thousand 00-100 Dollars . ($1000.00), as Earnest Money, and in part payment for the purchase of the following described property situated in the County of Stearns and State of Minnesota, viz:
“52.90 acres of W-J of SW-J less 3.90 acres, in Sec. 17, and the South 100 rods of the E-J of SE-j- of Sec. 18, in Township 122, Range 32, Containing in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- George v. ConhaimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Freeman v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Gregory v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Steiner v. ZwickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Summers v. Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Miracle Construction Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Burns v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.