Legal Opinion
In Re: Kersey v.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 25, 2005No. 04-8016PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
2Per curiam
Attorney George E. Kersey was ordered disbarred by the New Hampshire Supreme Court in February 2004 and then, in reciprocal fashion, by a single justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in July of that year. Initiating our own reciprocal discipline proceeding in September 2004, we directed Kersey to show cause why this court should not impose a similar sanction. Having reviewed his written responses and held oral argument, we now order that Kersey be disbarred from the practice of law before this court.
Our recent…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Wainwright v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Noviello v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re: Williams v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re KerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- In Re ZenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Padmanabhan v. PaikosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- In Re: Burbank, II v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019