Legal Opinion
In Re: Williams v.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 16, 2005No. 03-8015PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
In April of 2004, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court ordered Charles G. Williams III disbarred from the practice of law. According to the court’s order, the evidence “established a pattern of client neglect, excessive fees, incompetency, unauthorized disclosure of financial information, failure to respond to orders of the Fee Arbitration Commission, and failure to respond to inquiries from Bar Counsel.” Following that disbarment, this court issued an order to show cause why Williams should not be reciprocally disbarred. See Fed. R.App. P. 46(b)(2). The respondent attorney sought and was granted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re RomanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- In Re BarachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- In Re Oliveras López De VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- In Re ZenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- In Re: Kersey v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.