Legal Opinion

In re Kersey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 21, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of a single justice of this court disbarring the respondent, George E. Kersey, from the practice of law, pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 4:01, § 16, as appearing in 425 Mass. 1319 (1997) (reciprocal discipline). The respondent claims error because (1) his disbarment in New Hampshire is wrongful and was based on a wrongful New Hampshire suspension imposed as reciprocal discipline for a three-month Massachusetts suspension (Matter of Kersey, 15 Mass. Att’y Discipline Rep. 317 [1999], aff’d, 432 Mass. 1020 *66[2000], cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1127 [2001]); (2) he was deprived…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Acadia Insurance v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. In the Matter of DawkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. In re CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Kersey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. In re SteinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. In re SheridanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. In re MitranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. In re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API