Legal Opinion

Padmanabhan v. Paikos

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 29, 2017No. Civil Action No. 17-10936-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge

This case arises from the indefinite suspension of the medical license of Dr. Bhar-anidharan Padmanabhan (“plaintiff’ or “Padmanabhan” or “Dr. Bharani”) by the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine-(“BORIM” or “the Board”). Pad-manabhan, who appears pro - se, alleges that BORIM’s initial decision on August 7, 2015, recommending no discipline became a final binding decision on February 3, 2016, and that BORIM’s May, 2017, order suspending his license was therefore an unlawful ultra vires act. More specifically,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Wainwright v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Padmanabhan v. HulkaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Padmanabhan, MD PhD v. HulkaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API