Ex Parte Hayden
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Sheriff of Santa Cruz County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Petitioner was convicted and sentenced to punishment for a violation of the provisions of a state statute, which provides as follows: “All fruit, green and dried, contained in boxes, barrels or packages, which shall hereafter be shipped or offered for shipment in this state by any person, firm or corporation, shall have stamped, branded, stenciled or labeled in a conspicuous place on the outside of every such box, barrel or package, in clearly legible letters, at least one quarter of an inch in height, a statement truly and correctly designating the county and immediate locality in which such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- People v. . HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ruhstrat v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Young v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ex Parte DrexelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- McKay Jewelers, Inc. v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- County of Sacramento v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.