Legal Opinion

County of Sacramento v. Pfund

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1913No. Sac. No. 2043PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the County Clerk of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is a proceeding in mandate to compel the respondent, the county clerk of Sacramento County, to pay into the county treasury certain fees asserted to have been collected by him as such county clerk for services performed in the issuance of hunting licenses under the act to regulate and license the hunting of wild birds and animals. (Stats. 1909, p. 663.) Section 2 of that act provides as follows : “Licenses granting the privilege to hunt, pursue or kill wild birds or animals shall be issued and delivered upon application, by the county clerk of any of the counties of this state, or by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Warfield v. Sutter Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Central Pacific Railroad v. ShackelfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Swamp Land District No. 307 v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. EscobarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. County of Sacramento v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Cnty. of San Diego v. Comm'n on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. County of Ventura v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API