Legal Opinion
Arcand v. Brother International Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 30, 2009No. Civil Action 3:07-cv-4987 (FLW)PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge:
Presently before the Court are two motions filed by Defendant Brother International Corporation (“BIC”): (1) a motion to dismiss all claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and (2) a motion to strike nationwide class allegations pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(f). In their First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”), Plaintiffs Diana Arcand (“Arcand”) and Thomas Shoosmith (“Shoosmith”), individually, and on behalf of a putative class of consumers (collectively “Plaintiffs”), who purchased Brother-brand laser printers and toner cartridges, assert claims against BIC for:…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Lieberson v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Smajlaj v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Mickens v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.