Smajlaj v. Campbell Soup Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This putative class action is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Docket Item 15.] Plaintiffs allege that they are consumers who were misled by the labels on cans of Campbell’s less-sodium tomato soups, as well as Campbell’s website and other marketing, into buying cans of the higher-priced less-sodium soups even though the sodium content of those soups was equal or nearly equal to that of Campbell’s regular tomato soup. Defendants seek to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Koenig v. Boulder Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Whitaker v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Lieberson v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- John Harnish v. Widener University School of LCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.