Bellile v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. This is another appeal in a recent line of cases that asks us to determine whether an underinsured motorist (UIM) reducing clause in an automobile insurance policy creates contextual ambiguity.1 Susan Bellile appeals a declaratory judgment limiting American Family Mutual Insurance Company's liability for UIM coverage to $100,000 after applying the policy's UIM reducing clause. She argues the organization of the policy along with the limit of liability provisions when read in conjunction with the reducing clause creates contextual ambiguity. In light of the supreme court's recent decision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Maas Ex Rel. Grant v. ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Secura InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olson v. FarrarWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Ruenger v. SoodsmaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. AcuityCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. Cos.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Sec. Health Plan of Wis. Inc. v. Am. Standard Ins. Co. of Wis.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.