Legal Opinion

Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2000No. 98-2762PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 1. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company (West Bend) appeals the circuit court's judgment declaring that Wis. Stat. § 632.32(5)(i)l (1995-96)1 violates the substantive due process clause in Wis. Const, art. I, § l,2 and U.S. Const, amend. XTV, § l.3 Section 632.32(5)(i) authorizes the use of a type of reducing clause as a permissible provision in uninsured or underinsured motor vehicle insurance (UIM). A reducing clause permits a setoff from the insured's UIM coverage the amount paid to the insured by the underinsured tortfeasor. The statute provides, in relevant part,(i) A policy may provide…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API