Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
¶ 1. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company (West Bend) appeals the circuit court's judgment declaring that Wis. Stat. § 632.32(5)(i)l (1995-96)1 violates the substantive due process clause in Wis. Const, art. I, § l,2 and U.S. Const, amend. XTV, § l.3 Section 632.32(5)(i) authorizes the use of a type of reducing clause as a permissible provision in uninsured or underinsured motor vehicle insurance (UIM). A reducing clause permits a setoff from the insured's UIM coverage the amount paid to the insured by the underinsured tortfeasor. The statute provides, in relevant part,(i) A policy may provide…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.