Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. Cos.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtKessler, J.
¶ 1. Bernard J. Shira and Maria Shira appeal from an order for summary judgment dismissing their claim against American Family Mutual Insurance Company. The dismissal was based on the trial court's conclusion that American Family's reducing clause, which is based on Wis. Stat. § 632.32(5)(i)2. (2001-02),1 unambiguously allows the reduction of uninsured motorist policy limits by worker's compensation funds that were paid to the State Work Injury Supplemental Benefit Fund ("the State") because the insured had no dependents as that term is defined by worker's compensation statutes. We conclude…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Taylor v. Greatway InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Gonzalez v. TeskeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Danner v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Secura Supreme Insurance Company v. The Estate of Daniel Keith HuckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. Cos.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004